Sketchplanations
Sketchplanations podcast photo of Rob Bell, Tom Pellereau and Jono Hey
Prefer to listen?
🎉 Help keep Sketchplanations ad-free by supporting me

The coastline paradox

What is the coastline paradox explained - meaning the length changes depending on the size of your ruler, with Great Britain's coastline as an example
  • Prints

👇 Get new sketches each week

How long is the coastline of Britain? The surprising answer is: it depends. This is the essence of the coastline paradox.

What is the Coastline Paradox?

The coastline paradox, sometimes called the coastline problem, is the observation that the measured length of a coastline changes depending on the size of the ruler you use and how closely you look. If you measure Britain’s coast with straight segments of 100 km, you might get around 2,800 km. Reduce the step to 50 km, and the length increases to about 3,500 km. Go down to 1 km, and the length leaps to more than 8,000 km. The closer you look, the longer it gets.

Why does this happen? Coastlines are full of detail. If you were to measure the coastline of a country using a ruler on a globe, you’d get a very different result than if you paced around every bay, inlet, and headland. The closer you look, the more wiggles and squiggles you find. And instead of converging on one “true” length, the coastline just keeps getting longer. The smaller your measuring stick, the longer the coastline appears.

Origins of the Coastline Paradox and the Fractal Dimension

This effect was first spotted in the 1950s by the Englishman Lewis Richardson, while testing a theory that the likelihood of war between countries depended on the length of their shared borders. He found something remarkable: the quoted lengths of borders varied widely. By measuring with different map scales (or smaller callipers), the measured length systematically increased.

When examining coastlines rather than borders, Richardson noticed that some countries’ coastlines grew faster than others as the scale shrank. Norway’s crinkly fjords, for example, produced a much sharper increase than Britain’s, which in turn increased faster than South Africa’s. This rate of increase later became known as the fractal dimension of the coastline. In some ways, it's a measure of the wiggliness of a coast.

Long after Richardson’s research, Benoit Mandelbrot published a paper, "How Long Is the Coast of Britain? Statistical Self-Similarity and Fractional Dimension ", that discussed how the wiggliness of something like a coastline at one scale can be repeated at smaller and smaller scales. The work led to the later term fractals.

Many other things exhibit fractal-like behaviour, such as river networks, mountain ranges, borders, brains, frequencies, lightning, and even the stock market. There’s a super section on this in Scale , by Geoffrey West.

So is there a true length of a coastline? Not really. That’s the paradox. At very small scales, the length approaches infinity. Crazy.

Related Ideas to The Coastline Paradox

Also see:

More paradoxes:

I updated this sketch from the original for my book Big Ideas Little Pictures

Published
Buy Me A Coffee